But YouTube-dl is not solely designed for that purpose, as the RIAA alleges. The RIAA is not wrong that YouTube-dl exists as a technological workaround for streaming-only video, and it would be a lie to claim that nobody uses it for helping themselves less-than-lawfully to music tracks-people absolutely do. The RIAA notice specifically cites three examples provided in YouTube-dl documentation and source code that make reference to copyrighted music videos by Icona Pop, Justin Timberlake, and Taylor Swift-all of whom are represented by RIAA-member labels-to back up the claim. circumvent the technological protection measures used by authorized streaming services such as YouTube, and reproduce and distribute music videos and sound recordings owned by our member companies without authorization for such use." Instead, it alleges that the code itself is a violation of a different section of US copyright law (as well as German copyright law), because the "clear purpose of this source code is to. We have disabled public access to the repository."Īlthough the notice is framed as a DMCA issue, the takedown notice from the RIAA, dated Friday, does not make claim that YouTube-dl is an act of copyright infringement. Those repositories now display a message, reading, "This repository is currently disabled due to a DMCA takedown notice. GitHub, which is owned by Microsoft, removed 18 projects on Friday that previously hosted versions of YouTube-dl, a Python library that allows for the downloading of YouTube video and audio files. YouTube / Getty / Aurich Lawson reader comments 246 withĪ popular tool used for archiving YouTube videos, YouTube-dl, is gone from GitHub after the Recording Industry Association of America filed a claim arguing that the code is inherently illegal under copyright law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |